Jump to content


Photo

An open letter to AutoDesSys regarding the interface


  • Please log in to reply
52 replies to this topic

#21 Chris lund

Chris lund

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 567 posts
  • LocationWestcliffe Colorado

Posted 20 May 2015 - 12:47 PM

I am not having an issue with pallets staying put.   Actually, They are a little too persistent.  It would be preferred to have them return to a chosen default.   However, If I move something just to get it out of the way for what ever reason, they stay put between sessions.  Without saving the pref file.

 

Agreed,  I too would like all pallets to be dock-able.   A single dock, is not enough.    Or at least, if they are pulled out of the dock, they should snap to each other as 6.x.

 

I do also find that Choosing tools was faster in 6.x  than 7+.     the popup tool palettes get in my way if all I want it to select the already displayed tool of that set.

in 6.x if I want more, I just hold the mouse button down for a fraction of a second for the popup then drag straight to the tool I want.  All nice and neat in a single row.

 

7+  it always pops up  and I have to hunt on multiple rows to find what I want.   Does slow the process.    

 

Concession, these Items do need addressing


  • Ekbergzem and RudyItapsut like this

Christopher Lund

Neurascenic - Industrial Design


#22 setz

setz

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 395 posts

Posted 20 May 2015 - 01:43 PM

Hi Chris,

 

If you haven't already, select this to speed things up a bit...

Screen Shot 2015-05-20 at 11.38.20 AM.png


  • 3dworks likes this

#23 Chris lund

Chris lund

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 567 posts
  • LocationWestcliffe Colorado

Posted 20 May 2015 - 01:49 PM

Setz,  I do have that set.   Becomes unusable IMHO without it.   The Tool Palettes still pop up and get in the way.


Christopher Lund

Neurascenic - Industrial Design


#24 andrew

andrew

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 78 posts
  • LocationMinneapolis

Posted 22 May 2015 - 09:09 AM

I am interested to see what the file you linked to because I have had similar thoughts.  In the earlier post I call this setup you described a modal UI. The whole workspace sits in a boundary and is adjustable depending on the screen used.  So a 30" single screen acts consistently, a 2 monitor setup acts consistently, and if I switch to a just laptop screen, I can toggle/collapse palettes similar to the way photoshop or illustrator works on the right side of the screen.

 

In formZ 8.x , if I open the program on a macBookPro retina, not only do the right hand palettes not fit well, but you cant even drag the enclosing palette window to the fill screen height. it actual restrains you and wastes space in the lower right corner. The top palette bunches up, etc.  Its just a UI mess that doesn't seem to react to its display environment.

 

What does work well in other programs is Cinema4D. Modo. Blender. Photoshop. Rhino. Autocad.  Some of these have the palettes approach and some are modal like C4D or Modo where everything always fits to the current display setup and you can rubberband things to where you want them quickly and then save that as setup.  

 

FormZ has preference setups and such, but they never seem to stick and they have always been a bit convoluted as to whether its a preference or whether its a template or whether its a workspace and not having these three areas setup correctly yield unexpected results and is VERY frustrating, especially to long term users who have learned to get it consistent one way up until v6.7 and then the new interface comes along and its similar but doesn't actually work predictably that way anymore.

 

What I hear in this this thread is the need for ADS to really, seriously address this once and for all, as it has a significant effect on workflow and user XP with the program.  If other 'brands' are gaining users and community by having a consistent and predictable workspace, why WOULDNT the developers make this an absolutely top priority?  I think this is what many of us continue to try and articulate, in a respectful way.



#25 Walter

Walter

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 53 posts
  • LocationAUSTRIA

Posted 23 May 2015 - 01:59 AM

Go back to the main Topic:

 

I just can agree with the first post that there a no really improvements in the Interface.

 

For me it's horrible when opening a file on an second machine - if there the Interface Windows are not on the absolut same Position the main window is opening anywhere.

 

 

"For years" im posting here about the Interface - i'm a Little bit dissapointed that i get no audience.

 

Just look at an other programs - the are all over working fine - i don't know why FormZ goes such an strengh way with an own Interface.

 

 

 

In the attachement there are pics out of autocad in 2 different resolutions. the drawing window is allways fix in the middle, it just get smaller but still stays proper conected to the other palettes.

 

When opening a file on a machine where the palettes are not really similar the drawing window covers other windows and have to be resized.

 

Looking forward that FormZ comes out of the 80s and there will something done "in the near future".

 

 

Attached Thumbnails

  • pic1.jpg
  • pic2.jpg


#26 Des

Des

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 362 posts
  • LocationIreland

Posted 23 May 2015 - 04:28 AM

AutoCad... what a horrible program and interface..



#27 andrew

andrew

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 78 posts
  • LocationMinneapolis

Posted 23 May 2015 - 11:28 AM

Yes, Des...we are lucky to have FormZ!  But his point is well taken. Its a modal window concept that keeps everything where you expect regardless of the windows resolution, number of monitors, etc.  This thread really is asking for ADS to take an honest look at what creates confusion in the interface, listen and then code and release as if it were a feature, not just UI housekeeping.

 

When you open formZ and want to get to work, the last thing you want to do is re-arrange everything or have to find some sort of default that has changed.

 

Another approach that I see other platforms using is the opening Window that formZ now has as well (unless you turn it off) . Sketchup uses this to set a drawing template.  Autocad does the same. FormZ could do the same instead of tutorials have workspaces. One for laptops. One for 2 Screens. One for imperial feet and inches. One for Metric.  etc.

 

One more misc thing. Could we get the Maxwell plugin to not open the preview window when for Z opens?  Pretty please?



#28 andrew

andrew

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 78 posts
  • LocationMinneapolis

Posted 23 May 2015 - 11:34 AM

After I read my post, I started laughing thinking back to the good old days of a big drafting table, parallel bar, templates, triangle, pens and mechanical pencils etc.

 

We've come a long way, since the days of the hand-drawn world and I remember the freedom that software brought to us!  What made me laugh was imagine if someone came into your studio at night, and split your drafting table in half, turned your ruler 90 degrees, changed all the lead in your pencils and super glued your trianlge to one fixed angle and you couldnt figure out how to put everything back.  

 

Its kinda like that.  : )



#29 martinb

martinb

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts

Posted 23 May 2015 - 01:28 PM

hi to all,

for me, palettes are fine because i can arrange them the way i like - at least they would be fine if working correctly.
- to have an impression please visit (once again) vectorworks - the main difference to formZ is that their palettes have the ability to stay in exactly the same place i put them! - i don´t know if things have improved with 8, because i am still on 7, but maybe not...

i have 5 suggestions:

1. try to make palettes really costumisable regarding their size (allow very detailed settings - avoid big steps like they happen with materials palette or the lights palette which jump line by line!!!)

2. try to make palettes and windows and everything to stay in the place where you put them - maybe we would need kind of a screenshot function that saves all positions (its just numbers i guess?) for a desired screen setup?

3. try to have a simple and efficient file dialogue for the workspace settings - like the one for the keyshortcuts (i suggested this about 2 years ago...) - to avoid problems with corrupted setting-files (if you have access to the file which stores all the correct(!) workspace settings, you could duplicate it easily to avoid further corruption and you could call it from within the program to restore the prefered settings)

4. try to avoid the jumping around of palettes - especially in the formZ window - when rearranging them - i would leave it up to the user to put them in place and to make everything visible! if necessary, give up this special formZ window at all.

5. try to show the names of palettes always (maybe if the palette is too narrow add some dots... or use initials instead of loosing  the whole name - this happens with the costum reference-planes-palette for example)

 

 

and maybe let the user decide if he/she would like to have free floating palettes or a fixed layout - like in autocad (i dont know how this kind of layout is called?!?!?) - i personally prefer palettes, but without their (actual) annoying behavior please!

 

i think this layout- and workspace issues should be really solved, because it gives no good impressions to new users and its really so much work to costumize the program the way you want it - just to find out, its not working... frustrating!!!!

 

btw, does anyone know what happens if updating for example from 7 to 8 - do you have to rebuild everything or can you take the workspace to the next version?

 

one question to ads: will there be an update for 7 as well, if you decide to improve the interface???

 

sorry for the long post,

thanks for reading and nice greetings!

martin

formZ 7.3.4

macos X 10.6.8

macbook pro 13" mid 2010



#30 Guest_seasdes_*

Guest_seasdes_*
  • Guests

Posted 23 May 2015 - 08:05 PM

For me FZ interface is too clunky. You have to search to find command which slows dow the drawing process.

Just look at the Sketchup interface. Very simple and intuitive and like many other programs (CAD or otherwise).

If you are trying to attract users then make the interface familiar. Otherwise you will be just supporting the existing user base.

My 2c worth.

Walter



#31 Walter

Walter

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 53 posts
  • LocationAUSTRIA

Posted 24 May 2015 - 02:40 AM

@ Des: it doesn't matter if you like AutoCAD - i could have make screenshots of any other program - they are still working similar when changing Resolution - and that's what it would like to show

 

For me FormZ is the best modelling Software - if not i would have changed for years.

 

After the last years FormZ did a lot of improvements in tools and drawing itself and did a really great job but they neglected everything else.

 

 

I think it's time that the next main task is the interface and all arround.

 

A program can be brilliant itself - but if you can't handle it an easy way it's useless.

 

 

Just my 2 cents.

regards

walter



#32 Des

Des

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 362 posts
  • LocationIreland

Posted 24 May 2015 - 03:58 AM

I agree that the interface needs some fixing and some tweaking, but they (ADS) are moving ahead quite well considering how much juggling they have to do to keep everyone happy. I remember reporting "pallete creep" in v7, it took a while but they fixed it eventually.

My Acad statement earlier was a bit blunt but imo not unfounded, I use Acad two to three days a week and can't wait to get back to Fz.

 

The SketchUp interface is only ok, a bit simplistic for me. I wonder how well SU interface would work if it had the amount of tools FormZ has to deal with?

 

But yes, an option to have a "fixed" or "floating" and functional kind of interface would indeed be welcome.

BUT, not too far removed from what they have done so far!


Edited by Des, 24 May 2015 - 04:00 AM.


#33 Chris lund

Chris lund

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 567 posts
  • LocationWestcliffe Colorado

Posted 26 May 2015 - 02:49 PM

Andrew,

 

I now understand what you want, and For the most part I agree.   However, the terminology, I am pretty sure is wrong.

 

Here is the full definition of a modal window/ system.   

http://en.wikipedia....ki/Modal_window

 

I am not sure what you want is called, but it isn't "Modal"


Christopher Lund

Neurascenic - Industrial Design


#34 andrew

andrew

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 78 posts
  • LocationMinneapolis

Posted 26 May 2015 - 05:29 PM

well at least were in agreement!  Thank goodness for Wikipedia.  : )  

 

Hopefully, FormZ will continue to improve as we continue our support and it grows with new users.  I sat with an associate of mine today that introduced me to the program back in the mid-ninties.  I remember how exciting it was to model with it back then and get quick beautiful results that I could take to clients.

 

with v8, I feel a bit of that excitement again. I hope it continues to grow with users so ADS can put more resources towards the UI.


  • Chris lund likes this

#35 Mike_A

Mike_A

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 13 posts

Posted 29 May 2015 - 04:44 AM

As the original poster of this thread I thought I would post a follow up. First: thanks to all - whether you agreed with my points or not, it's been a useful thread.

I do think it's only reasonable to acknowledge the progress that ADS has made in recent years - the improvements to on-the-fly modelling guides and reference planes, Open GL rendering etc. However I do maintain that the overall UI design and layout, panels / palette system, iconography and aesthetics all need significant improvement.

Asone asked what sort of interface look I was hoping to find. Well there are a number of softwares already mentioned in this thread - C4D, modo and others - that show attractive, flexible and functional UI design. Having said that, I'm not asking for a clone of any of them. Each of us are going to have personal preferences on the aesthetics of the interface, so my plea is slightly wider than a specific look.

My primary request is that AutoDesSys wakes up to the fact that the design and functionality of the UI is a very important part of their product - and makes a step change in priorities / staff / resources or whatever to address this at a fundamental level.


My priorities would be:

1. Fix the workspace and palette size and positioning system - as a matter of urgency.
This is currently broken as far as I'm concerned and is my No.1 frustration. Fixing it will at least give each of us some ability to adapt the current interface to our needs. I find it hard to believe that a company with the undoubted technical and intellectual capital of AutoDesSys can't get this fixed.

2. Put the resources in place to developing a modern, unified and coherent UI. This work requires a skilled UI designer - not just people who can code. I would also suggest enabling some form of input from the FormZ community - right at the start of such as project. This very thread shows that there is a considerable interest and valuable input available to ADS.

Here are some of the main features I'd like to see:

1. Flexible and functional workspace / palette management system.

2. Unified 'single frame' UI design with flexible boundaries for on-the-fly palette resizing that makes full and efficient use of the rectangular application frame, while maintaining the option to undock panels onto other screen(s) as required.

3. Clarified iconography and improved panel design and layout.

4. Clarified and refined preferences system.


Mike A.


  • AHDD Designer likes this

#36 rich f

rich f

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 55 posts

Posted 29 May 2015 - 01:22 PM

I'll add my 2 cents...
 
Note that I am a Luddite primarily using 6.7 I haven't loaded v8 so my comments are mainly regarding V7, but it sounds like v8 hasn't changed much. I still use black and white icons with a single-column layout for the tool icons. IMHO the switch to a two-column layout (that goes waaay back) was less than ideal from the beginning, and it is worse in v7/8. When you are "hunting" for tools, having the flyout pop out to the right and cover the adjacent column is always annoying, regardless of how quickly it fades or or is dismissed.
 
Specifically I feel it should pop straight out to the right, not offset down. A single click on the original tool (exactly where you just clicked, not moving over to click the new version of it that popped out) should dismiss the palette. There is always some degree of unnecessary mouse jiggling or clicking that has to happen. What about adding the click-hold method from V6 back in as an option? This is the most efficient way of handling it.
 
The two column layout especially doesn't work with the vertical text labels. Only the left-hand groups get labeled, and the right-hand tools (while just as important in the hierarchy) get no labels, and are not necessarily related to those on the left. And there is no need for small letters - all CAPS is more legible at that tiny point size. There a few that are too long (ex. "modify NURBS surfaces") which makes a mess if they get moved to the left column - (could be abbreviated to "mod N-SURF"?)
 
So then, in trying to recreate a single column layout, the tool manager is problematic. I like the flexibility it seems to allow, but it is cryptic to use. It gives the appearance of a non-modal dialog, when in fact you can't do anything else until it is dismissed. Perhaps the rest of the interface should dim letting you know that you are in "tool edit" mode. And it is a bit too easy to have tools disappear while you are editing if you drop them in the wrong place.
 
It does appear that with a lot of patience I can combine tools to get back down to a single-column layout - in which case the only additional request might be the ability to edit group names (which would also rectify the N-SURF example mentioned previously.)
 
But without the ability to export tool layouts, all that work is lost if I should need to reset preferences or something gets messed up. Between work/home I tend to work on a number of different machines/platforms. Preferences, workspace layout, custom tool layouts all need to be exportable (and reliable.)
 
Beyond that, the points below are all good - however, I have a strong distaste for "single frame" UI design. (perhaps Luddish again, I suppose due to decades of working on a Mac.) Impossible to please everyone; flexibility is good.
 

1. Flexible and functional workspace / palette management system.
2. Unified 'single frame' UI design.. while maintaining the option to undock panels.
3. Clarified iconography and improved panel design and layout.
4. Clarified and refined preferences system.

 
Apologies for the wall of text for what seems like some nitpicky little items. But they are things that slow me down and instantly turn me off in transitioning to v7/8.
 
Despite the complaints, I have to acknowledge the responsiveness (or at least willingness to listen) of AutoDesSys support staff - if it were any other company I would have no hope of any of this ever being heard or addressed.
 


#37 RobertH

RobertH

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 52 posts
  • LocationSan Diego, CA

Posted 29 May 2015 - 09:23 PM

Hey Rich f,

 

If you don't like the instant popup behavior of the tools you can turn it off: Edit>Preferences>Interface>Palettes and click the "Don't pop-up Tool Palettes on hover" check box. You can also turn off the group labels if you don't like them or they don't make sense in your situation. I like your idea of being able to edit the group labels. Of course you could also rearrange your tool bars so that the group labels do make sense. And saving a workspace is like exporting tool layouts, since you can also load them from disk, when you have multiple computers. You can also use a single-column tool layout in version 8, once ADS stabilizes the workspaces, if that's what you want.

 

The reason for advocating the single frame UI that a lot of us are making, is because there are no benefits of the current system. We now have a lot of wasted screen real estate that could be better used for design, along with the current instabilities. This is especially true on single monitor systems. I've used dual monitors in the past but I much prefer my current setup of one large monitor.

 

HTH



#38 Justin Montoya

Justin Montoya

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 334 posts

Posted 31 May 2015 - 08:24 PM

I DEEPLY miss the old pop up dialogs of v6.  Having all these extraneous palettes open all the time is a cluster #$@%, and closing or minimizing them while modeling just to have to reopen them again is nowhere near as easy or seamless as it was in v6.  The workflow of using the interface has been compromised by the unfounded need to constantly add new tools instead of just fixing the existing ones, or improving their usability.  When all this was brought up at the advent of v7 and again at v8, we would hear from support, "OK we'll see what we can do and get it corrected for you."  But alas, I think much of this has fallen on deaf ears, as with each 'new' release, the focus is always on the new tools, and very little on our issues with the interface, or fixing the problems with the last releases.  

 

After all this time, I'd still love to hear why the 'new' way is better.  For example, when you used to double click on a material, the material options dialog would pop up, you would adjust and could just hit RETURN with the keyboard, or click a big OK button.  Then,  the material options dialog would GO AWAY, saving valuable real estate for the modeling window.  Now, if you don't leave the material options palette open all of the time, it is a real PITA to constantly hide it, as the tiny minimize or close buttons are incredibly cumbersome to navigate.  I like to use the Materials as an example, because while working on a project, it gets used hundreds or even thousands of times, but this applies to the other tools as well.  The workflow is also missing when using the Scale,  ::cough::  sorry, Transform tool.  Why in the hell doesn't the typing cursor automatically go to the Transform tool options dialog box for editing the X, Y, Z scaling?  I really have to click again up there to edit?  REALLY?  And we're still missing our beloved detailed mapping window, which was promised to be brought back since v7!  How about being able to rotate a strangely angled object back to Ortho without having to draw a guide?  I can go on and on... 

 

But it all comes down to who is going to actually listen, or better yet, change things?  Maybe AutoDesSys doesn't realize how everyone is actually using the program?  Perhaps it would be helpful if everyone posted screenshots of their setup so we can find some common ground.  I personally try to minimize the interface so I can have a nice sized modeling window in my 1920x1200 24" monitor (I have 3, but only use 1 for FormZ, the others are used for inspiration and communication.)  This was never a problem until 7 & 8, where using the bloated interface, especially on my small 15" Macbook Pro while traveling, is a frustrating experience.

 

I'm all for progress (where's the new render engine that can show modern LED tape lighting effects, and is graphic card accelerated??), but some of these changes were made with little reason, and it should be simple for them to fix.  Instead, they use their resources to create cool new tools that most of us have little to no use for.  It's a kind of 'ME TOO' in the 3D program world.  Hey, it's a new year, that means we need to release a new version!? Gotta keep up with the Jones's!  How about fixing your existing versions before abandoning those that support you, with your hand out for more money for a new version that is slower, less efficient, and more unstable?

 

Obviously we're on here because we all care, and in some way, want to keep using FormZ if they could just make it better.  AutoDesSys, help us, help you.  Give us an OPEN support ticket system where we can see where our change requests stand and even vote on them?  The only way for FormZ to grow and thrive is with a community of supporters, working to share their needs and help refine it into the next level.  Right now, you've got a sort of community of loathing, each one a little differently annoyed by the lack of helpful progression and stability.  

 

What will it take to bring it all together?


  • Hugo and jonmoore like this

#39 Hugo

Hugo

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 208 posts
  • LocationNetherlands

Posted 01 June 2015 - 02:49 AM

Justin, i totally agree with you! +10

I love FMZ to work with, but I discover I feel tired to constantly posting requests about fixing or about things already mentioned in these posts. And that's a pity.

Anyway, hopefully ADS changes their focus to fixing!!
  • Mike_A likes this

VANDENBOOMEN-ARCHITECTen...

 

MACOS 10.12 SIERRA | Form Z 8.5.7 | Vectorworks 2017 SP | AutoCad 2017 LT | Maxwell Render 4.1.x.x | Thea Render | Renderzone | Affinity Photo and Designer

Mac Pro late 2013 8-core 3.0Ghz 32Gb RAM, 2x FirePro D500 3GB | MacBook Pro Retina 15" mid 2014 i7 2.8Ghz 16Gb RAM, Nvidia GeForce GT 750M 2Gb+Intel Iris

Mac Pro mid 2010 12-core 3,46Ghz 96Gb RAM, SSD | Mac Mini mid 2010 2,4Ghz 2-core 16Gb RAM, Nvidia GeForce 320M 256MB | Cinema Display 27" 2560x1440 | LG 31" 4K 4096x2160


#40 rich f

rich f

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 55 posts

Posted 01 June 2015 - 10:50 AM

- If you don't like the instant popup behavior of the tools you can turn it off...

- And saving a workspace is like exporting tool layouts, since you can also load them from disk...

- We now have a lot of wasted screen real estate...

- I know you can turn off the hover option, but I feel like the click-hold from V6 was more efficient.

 

- How does one transfer a workspace from one computer to another? I don't see a way to export a workspace file. I brought it up either on the forum or with tech previously and no one mentioned a solution.

 

- Its funny, I sometimes find the single frame layouts to waste more space... I guess I just feel too constrained about where I can put things. With floating palettes I can drag the modeling window as big as I want and minimize the palettes to get them out of the way. And I'm always on a multiple monitor setup.

 

...as the tiny minimize or close buttons are incredibly cumbersome to navigate.

This. There has been this push to make every palette non-model, and some of them just don't work well that way or don't need to be. It is frustrating that Material Parameters, Display Options, Component Manager, etc can't be resized or docked. Generally it seems like if you can't change the size or dock it, it should be dismissible with an OK or Return.


  • skomer likes this




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users