Jump to content
AutoDesSys Forums

Des

Members
  • Content count

    651
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    72

Posts posted by Des


  1. I only managed to install the latest update on my machines a few days ago but so far I'm happy.

    Hidden Line display is much better with a live update to the image as it calculates. Very handy on a large model to see the progress.

     

    Des


  2. I agree with what Chris & Justin said above, the extra hardware you mentioned will not help with importing of CAD files.

    Usually in my experience the problems are with the cad file itself. I get autocad files from different architects on a daily basis and rarely have problems importing them. But when I do, it's always because of the bloated nature of the file, usually caused by the massive amounts of fills, hatches, trees etc. While working for a while on Revit (ugh) last year I had similar problems bringing some dwg files into that as well. The laziness of some who create files like this is astounding to me when I import these files and see the stupid amounts of layers usually caused by copying and pasting from one drawing to another over and over (got one the other day with over 800 layers!). Anyway, if I get one that is causing me problems, usually a phone call asking the creator to save a copy of the file and just copy and paste the visible entities into another file, purge and audit. You are probably only interested in the geometry anyway.

    The biggest culprits in my experience are the landscape designers (sorry guys!) just because of the nature of their cad files with massive amounts of trees, shrubbery and general fills.


  3. I agree. I use these tools frequently myself when sharing my screen on video meetings. The feet should disappear after the mouse button is pressed.

    I get around it by using my 3dconnexion controller which works great once practiced.


  4. The point I was making is that we shouldn't be making the comparisons that are so often with other packages on this forum. My apologies if that wasn't clear or if the prices I mentioned are not correct ( I did a quick google search). Anyway, I think that the likes of those other 3d packages are exorbitant for people (freelancers) in the arch viz industry. I certainly could not afford to be paying such large amounts per year for something like revit and max. FormZ does a lot for what we pay for (for me anyway), but I see others here constantly comparing it to other softwares which cost a lot more and have an inferior modelling tool set imho. Yes, some may do other things better than FormZ (drafting) but for me it's 3d tools are incredible for what I pay for (as an all round 3d modelling package anyway).

    Anyway, I've caused this to go off on a tangent with my previous post by making comparisons by which I was trying to make the point of not making comparisons, so my bad. 😕 Ok, I'm confused now...

    More coffee...


  5. I chose FormZ many years ago because it was on the mac and thought it was the best out of a pile of other software I had worked on.

    Guess what? I would still choose FormZ over the rest even with it's quirks and shortcomings. I continue to make a living from it as my main package and would recommend it to anyone who wants to get into the 3d modelling business.

    I don't have most of the issues others have such as crashing and it's not because I'm an IT expert, 'cos I'm not. In my long time experience, I have found crashing to be caused from imported bad geometry and the such. Bad imported geometry is not necessarily caused by the software it was created on but mostly the creator. 

    I agree that the interface needs some work in FormZ, mainly pallets arrangement etc., but I actually like the look and feel/icons etc., call me what you want. I'm actually excited about the dark mode in the next iteration.

    valthewu, I think you think you're just trying to help but tbh I think you are just making this forum a depressing place (sorry, most of your 10 posts have been negative). We'd all love to see FormZ doing well and competing with the big boys especially since we've invested in Fz (Just to point out FormZPro is a LOT less expensive than other software it's being compared to on this forum, I mean C4D is $3500, Max $1545 per year and without add ons!, Revit $2310 per year, SU $695 but isn't a patch on Fz). But I think ADS has done remarkably well considering who they compete with.

    I think the future is brighter for FormZ with the Twinmotion integration (along with the existing Vray & Maxwell).

    Everyones opinion is important here, but lets be more positive about FormZ, it has a hell of a lot more positives than negatives. Lets do more of sharing 3d modelling knowledge, WIPS etc. (if I was considering Fz as a new user, I wouldn't buy it based on all the moaning about it here which obviously doesn't help marketing). ADS have given us this forum for our own benefit to learn etc., not as a rooftop to shout from.

    Dezzz

    😉

     


  6. Hi all,

    I'm really busy these days so I will need help modelling due the volume involved on multiple jobs.

    So I'm looking for someone to knock out clean, well structured layered models in metric. Architectural type layering.

    Someone trustworthy and experienced in FormZ and doesn't cost the earth.

    FormZ Version 9 files only. No rendering required, just bare models (may change in the future).

    Truthfully available.

    Paypal account needed (for obvious reasons).

     

    Email me at "des AT objectpreviews DOT com" if you're interested in some work over the next couple of weeks.

     

    I look forward to hearing from you.

     

    Des

     


  7. Thanks ZTEK for your detailed analysis, I've been watching this post for a while. The PDF is nice, and well laid out with nice clean lines, thickness's, hatching etc. Was the hatching generated in BricsCAD? It seems quite dense and might cause problems when printing but I'm sure that can be adjusted easily enough. I started back in the 80's drawing on tracing paper using varying pen thickness's to achieve this effect and I think you have managed to get the same feel (too many architects have lost this over the years imo). In fact I'm dismayed by the quality quite often of the lack of skill or the want to produce nice drawings these days, I receive drawings on a daily basis from designers that either don't work, are messy as hell and as a result are difficult to read. While I'm no longer required to produce drawings like this any more by choice (all my work is 3d imagery), it's still interesting to see.

    Query; the "reflected ceiling plan" is flipped as if one were looking up at the ceiling on your drawing. Is this a result of using a section of the plan with the "camera" looking up? In my experience a reflected ceiling plan is the same as the floor plan and not flipped over (like a mirror is held under the ceiling, hence 'reflected').

    I had not heard of BricsCAD until this post, it looks very capable and the fact that it's for macs as well is great. I started on Vectorworks and PowerCADD back in the day.

    Des


  8. Thanks John!

    I was actually quite pleased with how easy it is to bring the FormZ model into TM. I exported the model in parts to make it easier when there were design changes. For example, I had layer groups in Fz for each building, the site, street lighting etc. So when I had to make a change to a building I just exported it to overwrite the asset and refreshed the import which means the rest of the model stays as it was in TM.

    Also I had used Maxwell for the stills but when I needed to go to TM I obviously had to place the trees again so I created a layer in Fz with small cubes where the trees were (Maxwell mxs references) and exported that into TM. Then I could place the trees in their proper places and turn off the tree placement cubes later.

    Here are a couple of the Maxwell stills..

    280336724_NESemiHigh01-Duska.thumb.jpg.b978c33a92d5ee0bcbb74723c906dc58.jpg1037883968_DCSemiHigh02-DuskA.thumb.jpg.6ad176869eeee320a71e46a2e266923d.jpg


  9. Not sure but I think they're bringing out an update soon so they might be doing something to their web-site.

    But you can still access the materials library directly in the mxed application (material editor), they are all there.


  10. I think you can buy an old iMac for even cheaper online.

    Regarding the PDFs, in my experience it depends on what program they were created in determine the responsiveness. AutoCad creates terrible PDFs normally due to it triangulating all the fills and hatching so the file becoming way too large for what it's displaying although they can be compressed right down in Preview to display super fast.

    Here's a snapshot of FormZ & Pages running on my old MacPro. I don't use it for my main modelling any more (one of the machines on my mini Maxwell farm) although this old mac has a pretty decent graphics card for it's age so working in FormZ is actually great using "shaded work" & "shaded full". That might be my only concern with those old iMacs.

    419118898_ScreenShot2021-01-06at16_52_01.thumb.jpg.bc694bfc669627b9863813fb49a85bf4.jpg


  11. One of my machines is a 2008 Mac Pro and runs FormZ 8.5.6 just fine. The OS is El Capitan 10.11.6. and 4GB RAM. Pages is working fine and is version 3 as part of the iWork "08 suite.

    You shouldn't have any problems with FormZ assuming the computers are in good working order.

    My experience over the years is that FormZ modelling can be done on pretty much anything, the modelling functions only use one core anyway.

     

     


  12. You won't regret the move. It's been so long since I used v6.5 I can't really remember all the differences but you should get to know how the pick options work.

    If you have Auto Pick selected (I do all the time), hold down the commend key while hovering over your object. This allows topological selection, this is necessary for the texturing as per your query. So to texture different materials on different faces, select your material, select the paint tool, command click on the faces you want. If you want to have different scalings of the materials on the same object, use the edit texture tool and command click the face you want to set the size to. I sometimes use the Map texture tool with the mapping type set to "Best Match Per Face" selected. Then I can use the Edit texture tool to select each face to set the parameters.

    I usually switch back and forth between "Edit On Face"" and "Edit in 3d" in the Edit Texture Map tool options depending on what I'm doing.

    I'm sure others here will help with their suggestions with this and with your vray queries.

     

    Des


  13. 13 hours ago, fzdev said:

    Des,

    Regarding your tip #1, surface objects are properly imported into Twinmotion (and Unreal Engine), but are visible only when the surface normal faces the camera.

    If a surface is facing the wrong way, you can reverse its direction as you suggest (using formZ's Reverse tool), OR enable "Double Sided" materials in export options.

    Yes, I've figured that out now. But I did waste a lot of time on my first tries including exporting and importing multiple files to see the differences, all good now.

    The TM interface takes some getting used to and some functions are buried deep.

    Anyway, if there are other tips, please post them.

     

    Des

     

×