Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Future of Formz


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 AC1000

AC1000

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 24 posts

Posted 01 June 2016 - 09:18 AM

I have investigated different 3D applications several years now. I have used Form Z, Archicad, Fusion 360, Rhino, Autocad, Blender, Modo, Sketchup, 3d Max and many others. Main interest is fast concept modelling for architectural purposes: urban planning, building design, massing and so on.

 

I claim that I understand quite well the needs and maneuvers for efficient concept design. Conclusion is that we need modeling paradigm that allows us to model in nondestructive way. There is still huge demand for that kind of software.

 

Upcoming feature(s) in FormZ should be at minimum the following: boolean operations with ongoing and endure relations (you can edit operands and operators during modeling process). There is a screen shot of the desired situation when modifying masses. Just grab the boolean operator and enjoy.

 

One of the best boolean system is in Archicad. It gives you almost insolent simple way to manage boolean operators and it is nondestructive process.

 

In Modo 10.1(coming soon) you'll get very sophisticated construction history or modifier stack. As we know Modos interface is just beautiful but it is very sloooooow when modeling city or complex building with new procedural modeling system they are offering. It is definitely amazing when modeling one or two objects.

 

When you are modeling conceptual visions of urban areas you need quick calculations from constantly altering measures, areas and volumes. Some kind of tool or script should be in Form Z. Now I am deriving bottom faces of the volumes and putting them on their own layer. Then I use information management window to generate the sum. In multistorey building you have to copy that face several times.

 

We need quick exploration oriented application for architectural design. 

 

Archicad and Revit are too massive programs for early stage design purposes. They offer you crowbar for knitting. Sketchup is quite nice but as we know the basic engine is not very good for complex boolean operations and you suddenly became aware of the most destructive modeling app in market. Sketchup models are well-known for bad geometry. And when your colleague is busy and nervous the result is horrible. You can make nice presentations but the model itself is usually a mess.

 

Rhino is quite nice also, but it is not for exploration or adventurous modeling unless you start to use Grasshopper. But, again, you should see through Grasshopper and understand its generative (iterative) nature. Basic massing tasks are behind of everything and more you concentrate on that more great urban environment you will get. When massing task is done you can concentrate to generate ”granulations” with GH. 

 

Form Z should be THE architectural massing application in the market, for complex exploration and calculation. The interface should be revamped also (yes, again). MODO has now the best GUI on planet. When you see the MODO interface you start to drool and explore the software. But it is not designed enough well for architectural purposes.

 

Ok thanks for reading. Lets hope that FormZ will get more commercial users soon and the team will get enough resources to continue great software.

 

Attached Files


  • jsiggia, etroxel, Justin Montoya and 3 others like this

#2 etroxel

etroxel

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 211 posts

Posted 01 June 2016 - 10:08 AM

These are all great insights. Thanks for helping possibly steer the future development of fZ with your observations.



#3 Smarttec

Smarttec

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 23 posts

Posted 06 June 2016 - 12:18 AM

Well said AC1000 I have to agree with you. MODO has a wonderful interface and is rapidly improving but for architecture is clumsy and slow. I like its workflow approach in general and they are adding more and more features that make it a great tool - I sometimes think too much of an animation character based package but have seen some wonderful examples of product design and digital photography done with it and it's renderer. 

 

But the point is we are commenting on formZ which is due some major new updates which will be good but I fear that they have left their run late as the 3D market is really being pushed by some new technologies, 3D Printing and VR which are going to be the disruptive influencers. It is hard to compete against Autodesk and their subscription model and the vast range of specific design software that covers most bases. Of course Sketchup inspite of its bad geometry has a huge user base. I heard once that Trimble knows exactly how many users open the package weekly and who has paid versions and not - there were over 2M opens per week. I have found it hard to argue the case  against Sketchup with formZ because of the versatility that all their additional plugins offer both free and paid.

Now Rhino seems to becoming more successful and prevalent too probably because of the Grasshopper plugin ( Win. only ) capability something we miss is an easy 3rd party visual software development tool that makes it easier for users to add specifically capabilities, customisation and libraries that make it easier to generally use the tool.

We love the tool but without a wide user base, customisability and user based accessible libraries it remains the best kept secret in the 3D world.

 

Rob

 



#4 etroxel

etroxel

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 211 posts

Posted 06 June 2016 - 03:01 PM

Grasshopper v2 is in the works and it will be full parity mac & windows. Agreed that this is a huge part of the new architectural workflow.



#5 pfschuyler

pfschuyler

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 30 posts

Posted 06 June 2016 - 09:42 PM

One suggestion I had for the next version of FormZ was to provide a robust *.skp export capability, complete with layers, materials, etc..zero conversion.  Why?  I think that would be a smart strategic move because FormZ would quickly and cheaply tap into the vast Sketchup user base.  Sketchup users would have a huge modeling upgrade path with no workflow downsides, and this would instantly make obsolete about 1/2 of the extension warehouse.  For FormZ it would give the users instant access to much better presentation abilities, styles, a better layout system, and vast array of ready-to-go 3rd party plugins tools (renderers, energy modeling, write to warehouse easier, blah blah...etc.).  

 

I agree with many of the comments about the other programs.  It would be nice to see more parametric capabilities and FormZ take the lead in the industry....



#6 AHTOH

AHTOH

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 438 posts
  • LocationMoscow, Russian Federation

Posted 07 June 2016 - 10:34 AM

user based accessible libraries

 

Hi Rob.

I tried to create  this king of library. There where not much of interest: one enthusiast contributed two models and 5 users registered in order to download models.


Anton Voloshin,

architect, interior designer, product designer.


#7 rich f

rich f

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 53 posts

Posted 07 June 2016 - 10:39 AM

VR. VR. VR.

 

An interface that lets you build and manipulate in the virtual environment.

Whoever pulls that off first is going to be huge.

 

With BIM, parametrics, 2D layout, there are many other options and Z doesn't have the resources to develop all of it.

 

Put those resources into developing a virtual interface and they could be at the front of the next wave, instead of playing catch-up.


Edited by rich f, 07 June 2016 - 10:39 AM.


#8 Smarttec

Smarttec

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 23 posts

Posted 08 June 2016 - 06:31 AM

Ahtoh,

 

I have followed your work and enthusiasm for design using formz including your creative knowledge with the tool and I appreciate everything you have added. Libraries are just one part and they will be different in all parts of the world based on standards and needs. However, my experience is that a more dynamic product based push is required into some of these new fields like VR, 3D Printing, digital imaging and even more specific fields. The new renderers offer some opportunities once we see some realistic examples.

 

See Maxwell examples this client is also using Thea:http://bit.ly/25LVTsj

 

In my region the largest user base was Display Stand builder/designers but economics and disruptive changes has meant the demise of a lot of that industry and Vectorworks because it had better documentation tools. Most of the other work is architecture based and some new clients coming from the 3D printing world.

 

The user base for formZ has not grown in proportion to the new 3D CAD base and it is because the popular CAD systems are '3D Ecospheres' NOT unique packages and they encourage 3rd party involvement and development.

 

Sketchup file format conversion support both ways for formZ should be much better certainly with easier layer support but Sketchup itself is the core of something much larger, because of all the 3rd Party plugins  - that is my biggest wish that we could open up formZ with a visual language like "Grasshopper" in Rhino.

 

The key is there needs to be someway to get access ( easy to recompile )  these  current 3rd Party systems like Jewellery design, Interior design/ Kitchen cabinetry design/layout etc etc, more easily so they can be converted to a formZ ecosphere. And allow for more easy application use.

 

It's not easy, but a dream!

 

Does anyone else get this?

 

Rob


  • etroxel likes this

#9 bluemonkey

bluemonkey

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 75 posts

Posted 10 June 2016 - 09:49 AM

I agree that import/export compatibility is the key.

If Fmz can make the import export options even easier and more robust it opens up more libraries of pre existing components and the ability to work with other colleagues.

 

Most people don't use one single bit of software for their daily work, but a selection of the best tools. The better you can help to make these tools work reliably together the more chance of people adding FmZ to their tool box.

 

FmZ has some great modelling tools that would be of use to many people if they could swap around with other software easily.



#10 AHTOH

AHTOH

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 438 posts
  • LocationMoscow, Russian Federation

Posted 15 June 2016 - 03:34 PM

Ahtoh,

 

I have followed your work and enthusiasm for design using formz including your creative knowledge with the tool and I appreciate everything you have added. Libraries are just one part and they will be different in all parts of the world based on standards and needs. However, my experience is that a more dynamic product based push is required into some of these new fields like VR, 3D Printing, digital imaging and even more specific fields. The new renderers offer some opportunities once we see some realistic examples.

 

See Maxwell examples this client is also using Thea:http://bit.ly/25LVTsj

 

In my region the largest user base was Display Stand builder/designers but economics and disruptive changes has meant the demise of a lot of that industry and Vectorworks because it had better documentation tools. Most of the other work is architecture based and some new clients coming from the 3D printing world.

 

The user base for formZ has not grown in proportion to the new 3D CAD base and it is because the popular CAD systems are '3D Ecospheres' NOT unique packages and they encourage 3rd party involvement and development.

 

Sketchup file format conversion support both ways for formZ should be much better certainly with easier layer support but Sketchup itself is the core of something much larger, because of all the 3rd Party plugins  - that is my biggest wish that we could open up formZ with a visual language like "Grasshopper" in Rhino.

 

The key is there needs to be someway to get access ( easy to recompile )  these  current 3rd Party systems like Jewellery design, Interior design/ Kitchen cabinetry design/layout etc etc, more easily so they can be converted to a formZ ecosphere. And allow for more easy application use.

 

It's not easy, but a dream!

 

Does anyone else get this?

 

Rob

Hi Rob.

I wish I can understand each idea you wrote. However what I think: I would not expect to use carpenter`s plane to weld a metal or dig holes with microscope. During this years I tried some of packages with similar or higher than FormZ modeling capabilities: Blender, MODO, 3D Coat. What I found is — most of what I need I can do with FormZ. A few things are missing here: bullet physics and organic modeling. I can easily find them in in side apps like Marvelous Designer or 3D Coat. 

 From the other hand what would be a huge advance for me is 3DMax import. The majority of models I can use for my daily work are already existing in Max format. That`s what makes me green from envy looking how easy those guys who are using Max are creating their interiors or fassades from premade elements.

 Speaking of Sketchup modeling database I rarely can find something I can use for professional work. So no matter how many of bad models in database they are bad for 80-90%.

 

Speaking kitchen cabinetry you might need more specific tool like app that creates cuts and counts hinges and handles. Do you think it is a good idea to create such a plugin for expensive FormZ while this narrow specific industry standard apps are relatively cheap and much more precise in terms cabinetry making. I would not use creative nature app files in automatic or semiautomatic production. I never saw any of carpenter I know feed CNC with 3D Max file or exported from Max via plugin or any other way.

 

Best,

Anton.

 

P.S. AHTOH — is a joke. Written in capital letters it looks like it is Anton in cyrillic  :)


Anton Voloshin,

architect, interior designer, product designer.


#11 AC1000

AC1000

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 24 posts

Posted 05 February 2017 - 01:14 AM

Hi!

 

I started to learn Rhino+Grasshopper+ArchiCad live connection lately. Results are now very satisfying and I’d like to share some feelings.

 

  1. Parametric Live booleans are great and they work very well. You can move your operands during modeling process freely and results are great.
  2. You can modify Array related maneuvers nicely during process. Draw line, spline, closed line or what ever, place objects on them on preferred distance and modify parameters fit your needs.
  3. Live calculations work also great. You can have instant data out of you model.
  4. Grasshopper features are just great and unbelievable fast.

 

 

Why still using FormZ - a lot 

 

  1. Much faster to build architectural concept model than in Rhino. Push/pull tool is powerful.
  2. Visual feedback is nice in every display mode although antialias settings are slightly better in Rhino (you can have very smooth and crisp lines same time in Rhino when working in basic shade mode)
  3. Auto grid/plane with locking option is best in the market. It makes your workflow very very fast. No hassling with Construction planes in FormZ.
  4. Tool options when drawing lines, arcs, splines: you can start boolean operations immediately when insert and cut / fill -options are enabled.

 

Actually, features mentioned above are killer features on the market. 

 

  • etroxel likes this

#12 Smarttec

Smarttec

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 23 posts

Posted 05 February 2017 - 11:13 PM

FormZ does have the lot!

 

Just that the noise from all the other 3D package deafens any traction the package may have and like you people buy other packages and formZ needs to find a niche that people share what these tools/benefits add. I'd love that more than anyone. 

Hence the vision of a an application that has easy to use and standard programable capabilities is my 'hot button' one that allows existing and specific 3rd parties to offer specific solutions for formZ because it makes sense.

 

I want to see it stop being a secret; but currently 'the others shout it down' with any of these features lost amongst the marketing noise and other features, the reason you went to Rhino/ArchiCAD and found out the benefits of formZ.



#13 Andyb

Andyb

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 123 posts

Posted 09 February 2017 - 04:34 AM

Hi Rob.

I tried to create  this king of library. There where not much of interest: one enthusiast contributed two models and 5 users registered in order to download models.

 

I was one of these users who have used your library, and its been very useful. Its a great resource but my opinion is that it should be supported and run by Z. They should help to develop, push and promote its use.

 

I also agree with the comments regards to the interface, the interface desperately needs to be revamped. 

 

Furthermore, I also agree that Z should be the go to program especially for architects. Its a brilliant piece of software and its a shame that its not used more.

 

Here in the UK I think its very rare to come across any other Z users. 

 

Just my 2 pence worth.


  • Des likes this




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users